G1136-0800WNA – 800W High-Efficiency CRPS Power Supply for Advanced Data Infrastructure
Features
CRPS-185: 185×73.5x40mm(LxWxH)
Input: 90 to 264Vac,180-300VdC
Hot-plug
Full Digital control
Active Power Factor Correction
Intelligent-thermal Fan Control
N+N N+1 Redundant
Reverse Airflow Option
Applications
Server
Storage
Networking
HPC
AI Data Centers
Cloud Computing
Enterprise IT Systems
Medical Imaging Equipment
Approvals
UL/cUL
CB
TuV-Mark
CCC/CQC
FCC
CE
NOM
BIS
Specifications
|
Output Power (W): |
800 |
|
Length (mm): |
185 |
| Width (mm): |
73.5 |
|
Height (mm): |
40 |
|
Mounting Type: |
Hot pluggable |
|
Minimum Output Current (A): |
0 |
|
Maximum Output Current (A): |
66.6 |
|
Output Voltage (V): |
12 |
|
Minimum Output Power (W): |
0 |
|
Maximum Output Power (W): |
800 |
|
Minimum Input Voltage (V): |
90 |
|
Maximum Input Voltage (V): |
264 |
Model Selection Comparison Table
|
Model |
Power Tier | Output Current Profile | PMBus | Form Factor | Recommended Use |
| Balanced mid-range tier | 12V stable output profile | Yes | CRPS-class |
General compute, hybrid workloads |
|
| Upper mid-load tier | 12V heavier operations | Yes | CRPS-class | Storage + light AI nodes | |
| G1136-1200WNA | Performance compute tier | 12V accelerated load handling | Yes | CRPS-class |
Dense compute trays |
| G1136-1300WNA | High stability performance tier | 12V intensive continuous draw | Yes | CRPS-class | High-concurrency logic boards |
| G1136-1600WNA | Power-rich tier | 12V heavy cluster operations | Yes | CRPS-class | Compute-heavy + expansion scaling |
Deployment Scenarios
G1136-0800WNA positions itself as the practical step-up option within the G1136 family for workloads demanding stronger headroom and higher current handling than 550W configurations. It maintains the same balanced AC/DC design logic but pushes into heavier virtualization density, multi-NIC nodes, and hybrid workloads that involve sustained computation, VM stacking, and storage throughput. This capacity level is often chosen when deployments expect scale-out growth or when device clusters introduce varying IO patterns that occasionally spike. Many integrators adopt 800W as a reliable default for mid-scale racks where resilience, stable ripple performance, and predictable derating behavior outweigh extreme peak wattage.
|
Scenario |
System Demand | Why G1136-0800WNA is Preferred |
| Medium virtualization clusters | Higher VM stacking density |
Stability during multi-tenant resource peaks |
|
NAS + SSD + AI edge inference |
Mixed compute + storage | Handles IO bursts without voltage dip sensitivity |
| Multi-NIC routing server | Frequent packet spikes |
Well-managed transient response for routing tasks |
|
Compact HPC nodes |
Small-scale GPU inference | Better dynamic current ceiling vs. 550W |
| Software-defined storage | Write amplification tolerant |
Ripple control benefits data reliability |
|
Mid-scale IDC integrators |
Growing deployments |
Allows capacity expansion without PSU swap |
Power Architecture & Reliability Design
The G1136-0800WNA follows the same reliability fundamentals of the G1136 platform but introduces a more generous power envelope and improved thermal-load balance for dynamic burst behavior. CPU and GPU-lite inference activities often produce intermittent load waves rather than constant peak draw, and this is where the 800W level demonstrates clearer advantage over 550W — less stress during write storms, sync ops, and distributed memory cluster tasks.
A tuned LLC+secondary regulation layout assists in smoothing power transitions in multi-DIMM expansions or IO cards that renegotiate link states. Many operators observe lower retry events and more stable storage timing when power ripple is controlled at the PSU layer rather than relying solely on motherboard filtering.
Power integrity remains stable at moderate-high load ranges, allowing compute tasks to remain predictable even in constrained rack airflow scenarios. The fan profile adjusts gradually, maintaining acoustic comfort in non-peak tasks while providing sufficient cooling headroom as workloads intensify.
Component derating strategy improves lifespan behavior during warm continuous operation, and PMBus telemetry supports fleet visibility across runtime load curves, fan duty, thermal levels, and rail health. This aids predictive maintenance planning and aligns well with data center-style monitoring rather than purely manual inspection.
Ripple optimization and switching noise control benefit SSD write compression phases, reducing latency spikes during bursts in distributed storage and message queue throughput. In expansion scenarios, operators can upgrade to 1200W+ models without changing infrastructure wiring, enabling a smooth migration path.
Power Operating Notes
|
Reference Condition |
Suggested Guidance |
| Virtualization & VM stacking |
Maintain 60–80% for optimum thermal-efficiency curve |
|
Storage burst loads |
Ensure direct airflow clearance for controller cooling |
| Mixed NIC routing |
Expect better transient absorption than 550W tier |
|
Redundant deployment |
Match units for stable current share |
| Edge inference nodes |
Monitor PMBus real-time telemetry during peak |
|
Multi-SSD caching clusters |
Ripple benefits IO timing consistency |
| Warm rack environments |
Keep exhaust channels unobstructed |
|
Expansion planning |
1200W+ scaling path requires no structural changes |
FAQ
Q1. What benefit does 800W bring over 550W?
Greater transient headroom and stability for IO/storage bursts and VM density.
Q2. Can it operate in redundant mode (1+1 / N+1)?
Yes — the CRPS design supports live replacement and current sharing setups.
Q3. Does it support PMBus telemetry?
Yes — suitable for monitoring as part of data-center fleet oversight.
Q4. Suitable load type?
Virtualization servers, NAS-SSD nodes, routing appliances, container clusters.
Q5. Is this recommended for light GPU use?
Yes — for low-power inference cards or compact compute accelerators.
Q6. Compared to 1200W model?
1200W suits heavier continuous compute, while 800W is more cost-balanced.
Q7. Field service behavior?
Hot-swap friendly in CRPS bay with short maintenance windows.
Q8. Upgrade direction?
Scaling to 1200W/1300W/1600W allows deeper compute stacking without PDU change.