G1179-0350WNA – 350W 2U Power Distribution Board for Enterprise Storage, Cloud Infrastructure, and Network Hardware
Features
2U Dimension: 265x77x84mm(LxWxH)
Input: 90 to 264Vac,180-300Vdc
Hot-plug
Full Digital control
Efficiency: Platinum/Titanium
Active Power Factor Correction
Reverse Airflow Option
Intelligent-thermal Fan Control
1+1 2U Redundant
Applications
Server
Storage
Networking
HPC
AI Centers
Cloud Platforms
Edge Computing
GPU Workstations
Approvals
UL/cUL
CB
TuV-Mark
CCC/CQC
FCC
CE
NOM
BIS
Specifications
| Output Power (W): | 350 |
| Length (mm): | 265 |
| Width (mm): | 77 |
| Height (mm): | 84 |
| Mounting Type: | Hot pluggable |
| Output Current (V): | +12V/29A, +5V/20A, +3.3V/20A, -12V/0.5A,+5Vsb/3A |
| Minimum Output Power (W): | 0 |
| Maximum Output Power (W): | 350 |
| Minimum Input Voltage (V): | 90 |
| Maximum Input Voltage (V): | 264 |
Model Selection Comparison Table
|
Model |
Power Class | Use Role | Input | Form Factor | Recommended Use |
| G1179-0150WNA | Entry | Micro control compute | AC/DC | 1+1 2U PDB |
Monitoring & light routing |
| Mid | Edge + light VM | AC/DC | 1+1 2U PDB | Burst-capable deployment | |
| G1179-0350WNA | Upper-Mid | VM/storage light | AC/DC | 1+1 2U PDB |
Multiple services small scale |
| Mid-High | Multi-role compute | AC/DC | 1+1 2U PDB | Routing/IO concurrency | |
| G1179-0550WNA | High | Dense small servers | AC/DC | 1+1 2U PDB |
Heavier IO & VM |
| Strong | Storage + compute | AC/DC | 1+1 2U PDB | POP/CDN micro edge | |
| G1179-1300WNA | Extreme | Compute heavy nodes | AC/DC | 1+1 2U PDB |
GPU-lite workloads |
| Peak | AI/DB + compute | AC/DC | 1+1 2U PDB |
Scale-out fabrics |
Deployment Scenarios
The G1179-0350WNA moves into the upper-mid tier of the G1179 family, suitable for edge compute nodes hosting small VM clusters, SDS-lite workloads, branch security gateways, CDN relay points, and mixed routing + application scenarios. Compared with the 250W variant, the 350W tier provides more breathing room for sustained concurrency, frequent IO bursts, and multi-service fusion, making it a balanced choice for organizations scaling from basic control functions to light hybrid cloud roles. It is well positioned for distributed remote sites, micro-clusters, and storage relay workloads that require voltage stability over long uptime cycles.
|
Scenario |
Load Type | Why 350W Tier Fits |
| Edge VM clusters | Frequent burst workloads |
Extra reserve beyond 250W |
|
SDS-lite relay |
Write/read bursts | Better ripple stability |
| SD-WAN firewall | Encryption-active |
Maintains rail under spikes |
|
CDN POP |
Burst traffic nodes | Sustainable long sessions |
| Branch compute | Multi-service mix |
Balanced heat + power |
|
Cloud gateway |
Always-on |
Predictable runtime |
Power Architecture & Reliability Design
The G1179-0350WNA is engineered for environments with moderate virtual machine density, SDS relay activity, and routing workloads, where power stability is required without moving into high-wattage tiers prematurely. Its power architecture delivers consistent voltage behavior under persistent low-to-medium I/O demand, supporting micro-cluster deployments that operate continuously rather than in short burst cycles.
Voltage regulation remains steady as VM scheduling, routing sessions, and light storage traffic overlap, avoiding droop that can impact service responsiveness. Ripple control is tuned to reduce latency sensitivity in SSD-based logging and network-facing operations, ensuring predictable performance for SDS-lite platforms and routing-centric edge systems.
PMBus monitoring provides remote visibility into load behavior, thermal trends, and long-term operating patterns, enabling lifecycle prediction and proactive maintenance for distributed environments. With balanced thermal characteristics suited to 2U POP nodes and compact racks, the G1179-0350WNA serves as a practical step-up tier toward higher-capacity models, offering additional headroom while preserving efficiency and low-touch operational management.
Power Operating Notes
|
Reference Condition |
Suggested Guidance |
| SDS-lite compute |
Monitor disk temps under load |
|
Branch SD-WAN nodes |
Keep surge headroom available |
| Small VM clusters |
Allocate margin for peaks |
|
POP relay servers |
Verify airflow front-to-back |
| Cloud edge |
Run periodic PMBus audits |
|
IO-active workloads |
Evaluate scaling plan |
| Micro-clusters |
Maintain clean AC feed |
|
Expansion planning |
Move to 460W+/550W tier for heavier IO |
FAQ
Q1. Where is G1179-0350WNA most suitable?
It performs best in edge compute environments requiring moderate concurrency, such as small VM clusters, SDS-lite caching nodes, or SD-WAN gateways. Compared to lower watt tiers, it offers more consistent behavior during workload bursts, making it a reliable middle stepping point for sites expanding beyond basic control workloads.
Q2. Can this model run continuously for 24/7 edge duty?
Yes. The 350W configuration is designed for stable long-term runtime, with thermal and ripple performance tuned for continuous uptime. As long as airflow remains unobstructed and load stays within planned power envelope, long-term deployment is expected to remain predictable and low-maintenance.
Q3. What advantages does it have compared to the 250W version?
The 350W tier supports more VMs, higher IO frequency, and larger traffic events without power dip risk. This makes it ideal when an edge site starts hosting more services simultaneously, or when storage caching and routing tasks begin to overlap.
Q4. Does it support redundancy?
Yes. It is designed to work within 1+1 PDB redundant topologies, ensuring service continuity during PSU swap or failure. This allows edge clusters and POP environments to maintain uptime without manual intervention.
Q5. Is it suitable for small SDS workloads?
Yes, especially for caching-based or indexing-focused SDS-Lite workflows. If workloads involve heavy databases or sustained multi-disk IO, scaling to 460W/550W may be more future-proof.
Q6. How many VMs can it typically support?
Exact numbers depend on CPU class, RAM profile, and workload type, but it comfortably supports multiple lightweight VMs or a small cluster of micro-services, as long as burst peaks remain manageable.
Q7. Can it be deployed for POP relay or CDN micro-points?
Yes. With proper airflow and capacity planning, it performs well in small POP caching or relay nodes, where network and IO bursts occur periodically rather than continuously.
Q8. When should I choose a higher model?
When tasks evolve into IO-intensive SDS, multiple concurrent VMs, heavier encryption, or persistent burst workloads, upgrading to 460W/550W ensures buffer and lifecycle longevity.